A little while ago the European Parliament voted not to regulate e cigarettes as medical devices, opting instead to simply limit them to over 18s.

This is a good thing, because it means that these devices, which are a much safer way of consuming nicotine than tobacco, need to be easily available to consumers (like cigarettes already are), and not restricted to pharmacies, banned from on line sales, etc.

The bad news is that the European Commission seems to be getting ready to regulate e cigarettes to death despite what the European Parliament says.

There are a lot of regulations in the leaked EC document ( ) which will ban the liquid used to fill existing devices, restrict the size of cartridges and limit them to single use, restrict the concentration of nicotine deliverable by the device, limit the flavours available, ban on line sales, ban all advertising including on the internet, require nicotine levels to be uniform and not user controlled as they are now, and on and on.

In combination these regulations amount to a ban on every e cig/vaping device currently on the market, along with the juice to put in any existing e cigs and make it next to impossible for any effective devices to be developed and marketed in the EU in the future.

This will benefit only the tobacco companies and the pharmaceutical companies who make the less effective NRT devices. Smokers will not be allowed to choose the safer option of vaping. Many will go back to cigarettes and many of those will die because of this regulation.

I am not a smoker, nor do I use nicotine products of any kind, but I am deeply troubled by this development. All of this is going ahead despite the fact that the European Parliament voted NOT to regulate these devices as medicines. The European Commission is going to kill e cigs even though the MEPs we elected to represent us decided not to.

If the European Parliament can decide to restrict a product to over 18s and impose no further regulation, but the European Commission can then go ahead and design regulations so draconian that they amount to a ban on all such products, I have to wonder what the purpose of the European Parliament is at all.

If the decisions of our elected representatives can effectively be ignored, then democracy is a sham. Even if you care nothing for smokers or vapers, surely you care about that.

I have already sent an email expressing my concern to all of the Irish MEPs. Perhaps you could do the same, or maybe contact your TD, write to a newspaper, anything to make some noise about this.

This may not affect you, but if they can simply ignore the people you elect, then what happens when someone decides something you enjoy is a vice to be regulated out of existence?

You can follow Sean Billings on Twitter IrishCraftBeer

You can Like us on Facebook Here

Call to arms on e-cigarettes in the european parliament (updated) « the counterfactual

R1 ultra slim line cigarettes

Take action join the Brussels Vape In 10 July at the European Parliament !!

I did a recent full update on where we are with the tobacco products directive this posting is a further update to that. We are now in a crucial period before the ENVI committee vote on 10/11 July and it’s time to get busy&#8230 ask MEPs on the committee to reject medicines regulation as excessive and inappropriate, and to support regulation for e cigarettes that provides enough confidence in safety and quality but most importantly does not impose so much red tape, costs and restrictions that it kills off the appeal of the products to smokers.

Situation. The various players are haggling over the text that should apply to e cigarettes trying to get some sort of compromise hammered out before the crucial votes next week (10/11 July). The approaches are broadly dividing as follows&#8230 Socialist and Green groups seem unable to resist the urge to regulate e cigarettes as medicines, smothering a very clever innovation with red tape, costs and restrictions that will make them appeal less to smokers. Liberal Democrats (ALDE group) and UK Conservatives (ECR group) are the good guys so far, and have proposed a much more proportionate approach based on consumer protection legislation recognising that this gives e cigs the best chance to compete with cigarettes. The key political grouping is the large conservative European People’s Party (EPP) group . EPP is split but how they go will probably be decisive.

Updated 5 July Options in play. There are broadly three options in play, with a default to the Commission’s proposal if none are agreed by a majority of the ENVI committee.

Bad option 1. Regulate everything that isn’t a tobacco product but contains nicotine as a medicine see 10 reasons why this is a bad idea

Bad option 2. A ‘simplified procedure’ the rapporteur’s effort to find a compromise, but is basically badly drafted and incomplete medicines regulation in disguise (see my critique)

Good option. The Liberal (ALDE) group and Conservative (ECR) group have come to a common position (see below) update great news the ban on flavours in the earlier version has gone!. The warnings requirement remains excessive these are basically safe products and don’t need big warnings to put people off. The table below is a copy of the ALDE ECR amendment&#8230 they will be haggling right to the end so this will probably continue to change. It something that we can live with and much much better than having regulators micro managing everything. The advantage of this is that it has already built up support if EPP members will support it, then it could come out ahead. Any remaining problems could be ironed out before the plenary. The Legal Affairs committee led by Klaus Heiner Lehne (a senior German EPP member) proposed a very good amendment on e cigarettes in its formal ‘opinion’ . This is now replaced by this ALDE ECR EFD consolidated amendment.

Amendment 58 ALDE ECR EFD Consolidated amendment replacing Amendments 1146 to 1248, JURI 65, IMCO 59, INTA 55, AGRI 69, ITRE 65

Proposal for a directive

1. Nicotine containing products may only be placed on the market in accordance with the provisions for tobacco products as laid out in articles 5, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26 of this Directive. Member States shall ensure that nicotine containing products comply with all relevant EU legislation.

2. Nicotine containing products that are presented as having properties for treating or preventing disease may only be placed on the market if they were authorised pursuant to Directive 2001/83/EC.

3. For all nicotine containing products notified in accordance with the procedure set out in article 18 (1), Member States shall ensure that

(a) the product is clearly labelled with the nicotine content, instructions for use, instructions for reporting adverse reactions, and details of the manufacturer

(b) each unit packet and any outside packaging shall carry the following health warning “This product is intended for use by existing smokers above the legal smoking age as an alternative to tobacco products. It contains nicotine which is a highly addictive substance. Consult your doctor if you are pregnant, breast feeding, allergic to nicotine or propylene glycol, or have high blood pressure.”

(c) the sale of the product shall be restricted in line with the legal age for sale of tobacco products in the relevant Member State

(d) the products shall be available to be sold outside pharmacies (e) advertising and promotion shall be appropriately regulated

4. The health warning referred to in paragraph 3 shall comply with the requirements specified in Article 10. In addition, it shall

(a) be printed on the two largest surfaces of the unit packet and any outside packaging

(b) cover 30 % of the external area of the corresponding surface of the unit packet and any outside packaging. That proportion shall be increased to 32 % for Member States with two official languages and 35 % for Member States with more than two official languages.

5. Member States shall monitor the development of the nicotine containing products market, including any progress made in harm reduction, as well as any evidence of gateway use amongst young people. Based on the evidence, the Commission shall report back to the European Parliament and the Council 5 years after the transposition date of this Directive. The report shall assess whether amendments to this Directive are necessary

6. The Commission shall request an opinion from the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) within 24 months of the entry into force of the Directive in order to obtain reliable scientific and toxicological data to determine the health effects of the main ingredients of electronic cigarettes as well as suggestions for potential measures to regulate this tobacco related product.

What to do? If you want to influence the decision then this week is critical. E mail, tweet including MEPs name, meet the MEPs, stir up the local papers, and make sure these remote legislators know what you want they should be listening, there’s an election in May 2014. Join the Brussels Vape In 10 July.

My talking points would be

• Medicines regulation is grossly excessive, and in any case these products are not medicines, either legally or as a matter of common sense
• Why make it harder to sell e cigarettes than cigarettes? Why impose more red tape, costs and restrictions on the products that can free people from smoking?
• Why use a form of regulation that will destroy the very things that has made e cigarettes a success innovation, diversity, niche products and consumer enthusiasm?
• Please do not support any approach that is or looks like medicines regulation
• Please do support any approach that provides a sensible level of protection but leaves it to consumers market to decide which products
• Banning flavour is totally counterproductive e cigs are basically flavoured nicotine products, and it is good you can get them in flavours other than tobacco
• There are virtually no risks to children or any other downsides associated with e cigarettes they are always better and far less risky than cigarettes
• Ask where they stand and why, tell them how much it matters to you

&#8230 but you should always use your own ideas and words, and add you own experience and concerns. You can also draw on my own letter to MEPs 10 things to think about before you vote sent 4 July.

Who to contact You can write to your own MEP (use ). MEPs on the ENVI committee are particularly important at this time, and you can write to them as they are making the decisions. MEPs on the ENVI committee and part of the EPP group are
the most critical of all there are no UK MEPs in this group, but if you are reading from other members states, especially Germany, please act now!!

Feed the fire leave comments and feedback here and spread the news to other forums.

• Tweet

July 5th, 2013 Category Europe, Health, Uncategorized